\Feature\
\Feature\
Photo credit: Eric Sucar, University Communications
Together for Good

Dean Strunk Looks Ahead

Dean Katharine Strunk has a bold vision for the future of Penn GSE that builds on the School’s strengths, responds to pressing needs, and aims to change the world.
Photo credit: Eric Sucar, University Communications
K

atharine Strunk joined Penn GSE as dean last year because she wanted to have an impact. As a researcher, she had spent her career pursuing community-engaged scholarship in partnership with school districts and state departments of education, providing them with evidence to inform their policies. As a leader, she aimed to continue that kind of consequential work on a larger scale. Penn GSE, she reasoned, was the best place for it.

“Penn is a place where you do work that is intended to be applied,” she said. “We have some of the most brilliant scholars in the world housed here, but the difference is that we are not doing this research just to add more knowledge for knowledge’s sake. We are actually thinking about how we use that knowledge to improve the lives of learners and educators throughout the world. Everything we do here is intended to feed back into our communities—whether they’re here in Philadelphia, across the country, or across the globe.”

To that end, Dean Strunk spent her first year at Penn GSE in conversation with faculty, staff, students, and alumni to seek input for a plan for the School’s future that they could all work towards together. The result is a strategic vision for the next decade, Together for Good: A Vision for Transformational Impact, that expands the work Penn GSE is already doing, responds to urgent needs in the field of education, and inspires lasting change.

“This strategic vision is intended to build on GSE’s existing strengths and think about how we push them forward into the future,” she said. “We asked, from the very beginning of this whole strategic-visioning process, not just where do we want GSE to be in 10 years, but where do we want education to be in 10 years? And then, how do we not just meet that moment, but how do we make that moment?”

The plan is built around four main priorities: preparing and sustaining the educator workforce; fostering community engagement in Philadelphia, across the country, and around the world; innovating for the public good; and elevating education’s role in democratic society. These priorities cut across all areas of the School, its people, programs, scholarship, and mission. They are engineered to leverage and grow expertise, research, and programming that are already thriving at Penn GSE. And, most importantly, they represent crucial ways to improve the lives of students, educators, communities, and the fields of teaching and learning—both today and for a future we cannot yet even imagine.

“Our strategic vision is aspirational, but it’s also achievable,” she said. “But it’s going to take hard work. It’s going to take focus. It’s going to take everybody rowing in the same direction.”

Dean Strunk is ready to help steer that ship. She sees the role of the dean as empowering the School’s faculty and staff to “do the work that they do best,” while providing them with the resources they need to do the most significant research, support the most students, impact the most communities, and—in short—spur the most positive change.

“In 10 years, my hope is that we have changed the world,” she said. “I know that that sounds grandiose and unlikely, but I don’t think it is. We have the potential at GSE to do the work that reduces inequity and ensures more people can learn and succeed in a just and thriving society. . . . It’s time for real change, and I think that Penn GSE is poised to do it.”

PRIORITY ONE

Icon of three people inside a gear.

BUILD

PREPARE AND SUSTAIN A DIVERSE, HIGHLY SKILLED EDUCATION WORKFORCE FROM PRE-K THROUGH POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION
Preparing teachers and leaders has always been a cornerstone of Penn GSE’s mission.

“We have the best programs in the country already,” said Dean Strunk. “But we have a role to play in making sure that we continue to strengthen the educator workforce. Not just for teachers—who are, of course, critically important—but also for leaders and school counselors. We train everybody within the education workforce here at GSE, and we have a responsibility as a top school of education to do it as best as we can and as accessibly as we can for the most people.”

Penn GSE has long been a pioneer in educator preparation, with cutting-edge programs that emphasize hands-on training, research-based practices, and—with the School’s own Philadelphia neighbors in mind—a deep commitment to urban education. Those programs span traditional master’s and doctoral programs, as well as executive-format leadership training and non-degree professional learning.

“We are constantly working on improving our preparation of teachers,” said Patrick Sexton, executive director of Penn GSE’s three different experiential-learning teacher-education programs. “We assess everything that we do right after we do it . . . Because we’re a research-intensive institution, we’re always evaluating the work that we’re doing for its long-term impacts and the implications for the rest of the field.”

Sexton proudly noted that the markers of the programs’ success are evident in the numbers of graduates who return to mentor the next generation of teachers that Penn GSE is helping to create.

A teacher in a classroom engages with students, who are seated with raised hands.
An elementary classroom at Penn Alexander, one of Penn GSE’s two “whole partner” schools.
“When we go into schools and we look for new mentors, who’s raising their hand?” he said. “It’s our graduates saying, ‘Yes, I want to give back. I want to help, because I can see that the preparation that I got at Penn GSE helped my students learn, and I want that for all the rest of the students in this school, in my community, in our city.”

Research has shown that good teachers are the single most consequential school-based factor in a child’s success, and effective school leadership is the best way to retain those good teachers. But right now, there aren’t enough good teachers or leaders, especially in the under-resourced schools that need them the most. And the outlook for the future isn’t much better. High school students’ interest in the teaching profession has dropped by 50 percent since 1990, and the number of people earning a teaching license each year has plummeted by more than 100,000 from 2006 to 2021. Nearly one in 10 vacancies is filled by people without a standard teaching license, and 44 percent of teachers leave the profession within the first five years.

In the face of this unprecedented challenge, Penn GSE aims to offer an antidote. The strategic vision charts a future in which the education profession is respected, high-quality teacher education is accessible, and the professional pathways for both teachers and leaders are full. Penn GSE can help us get there by enhancing existing offerings to become a “one-stop shop” for lifelong career development, making educator- and leader-preparation programs more affordable and accessible to more people, and advocating for the evidence-backed policy changes that will use research to help change legislation.

“We’re working with policymakers all the time on how to collectively come together to answer the question about shortages, because teacher preparation alone can’t do it,” said Sexton. “We need to be part of the conversation.”

PRIORITY TWO

Illustration of four hands interlocked in a square formation.

COLLABORATE

COLLABORATE WITH LOCAL, NATIONAL, AND GLOBAL COMMUNITIES THROUGH SCHOLARSHIP AND PROGRAMS FOR THE PUBLIC GOOD
A graphic with the words "LEA SCHOOL" and "THE PLACE THAT LOVES YOU BACK!" surrounding a red stylized "LEA" with a heart shape representing the "E."
A poster in a third-grade classroom in West Philadelphia’s Lea School.
Community engagement has long been at the heart of Penn GSE. For almost a decade, its Office of School and Community Engagement (OSCE) has facilitated partnerships with the School District of Philadelphia (SDP) and individual local schools. It oversees a portfolio of projects from direct service programs, such as an enriched summer program that has provided academic and social service support to four local elementary schools, to systems-level support, such as the Responsive Math Teaching project’s model for inclusive math instruction. The office is also a hub for Penn GSE’s two “whole school” partnerships with the Sadie Tanner Mossell Alexander and Henry C. Lea schools, which integrate University resources into neighborhood schools.

Penn GSE faculty, students, and programs are engaged in roughly 400 different activities in more than 250 schools in SDP annually, said OSCE Director Caroline Watts, meaning someone from GSE touches almost every catchment area in the city.

“[The School’s] major partnership with SDP . . . takes the form of partnerships with our training programs, so that Penn GSE counselors and student teachers and reading specialists are placed throughout the district,” said Watts. “That’s a mutual kind of partnership, where we get our students trained on the job and the schools get extra personnel and resources.”

Now OSCE is poised to expand its work. This year, the office welcomed Assistant Professor Sade Bonilla as its first faculty research director overseeing its community-engaged scholarship. That work includes a collaboration between Penn GSE and SDP that leverages the School’s research expertise in service of the questions the district most wants answered.

Group of people standing on the steps of a building with columns and banners.
Students in the Urban Teaching Residency program guide VAST LIFE program participants through experiential-learning activities at the Franklin Institute.
Two individuals at a conference table with microphones and a projector screen in the background.
Dean Strunk and Philadelphia Superintendent Tony B. Watlington Sr. discussed the 2023 Pennsylvania school funding lawsuit at the Steven S. Goldberg and Jolley Bruce Christman Bi-Annual Lecture in Education Law in April.
“Being able to work with the school district on our research-to-practice partnerships is going to be a critical part of what the office does, so that we are seen not only as a resource for program development and student and faculty engagement, but that we’re a resource for answering important questions in partnership with the school district,” said Watts.

But OSCE’s Philadelphia collaborations are just one local example of Penn GSE’s community engagement. There are also collaborations with state and federal education departments, as well as international projects. Penn GSE faculty are currently engaged in partnerships in more than 60 countries. In long-standing collaborations in Mexico and Ghana, as well as in emerging ones in Serbia and Uzbekistan, the School’s faculty are partnering with local educators and communities to imagine solutions that address educational challenges.

One aim of the strategic vision is to formalize this work with a five-year global engagement strategy, coordinating different international engagement, identifying regional outreach priorities, and extending the School’s reach. Another is to make the resulting scholarship available, accessible, and digestible to ensure it informs the work of policymakers and the communities who helped create it.

A group of sixteen people smiling in an art studio with paintings on the walls.
Professor Nelson Flores (top row, center) with the research collective from CCATE.
“Community engagement means that we’re working with our communities . . . to do work with them, not to them,” said Dean Strunk. “That means we go to them and ask, ‘What problems are you facing? What do you need to know? What can we help you with?’ And then they help co-construct our research agendas and our programs, so that what we’re doing meets their needs every single time.”

Many Penn GSE professors are already engaged in this kind of collaborative, community-based work. For example, Professor Nelson Flores, who studies the intersection of language and race in education, has been engaged in a participatory action research study alongside Latinx communities in Norristown, Pennsylvania, for two years. He and a collective from Centro de Cultura Arte Trabajo y Educaçion (CCATE)—including local parents and students—have been working together to identify areas of research that would help improve educational outcomes for Latinx students. Their data collection will begin this year.

Whether in Penn GSE’s hometown or around the world, “we are seeking to effect powerful and sustainable and demonstrable change in educational and human outcomes for kids and families,” said Watts, “by being strong, present, engaged, responsive neighbors.”

PRIORITY THREE

Light bulb with an apple inside and radiating lines.

TRANSFORM

INNOVATE BY BRIDGING THEORY AND PRACTICE TO CONDUCT EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH WITH CONSEQUENCE
“Our third priority is around innovation for the public good,” said Dean Strunk. “And this is one of the strongest areas for Penn GSE throughout its 110-year history.”

Innovation drives everything at the School—its programs, its pedagogy, its scholarship. It’s the reason Penn GSE is home to both the Milken-Penn GSE Education Business Plan Competition, the most well-funded competition for purpose-driven ventures, and the Harold W. McGraw, Jr. Prize in Education, which recognizes individuals for their efforts to elevate human potential through educational leadership. It’s why, more than 10 years ago, the School launched the first ever education entrepreneurship master’s program. And its why the School launched its global innovation center, Catalyst, in 2018 to connect leaders across education, business, and technology to address critical challenges in education.

A woman teaching a group of children seated on a colorful mat with a small blackboard in the background.
Saturday Art Class, winner of the $25,000 Cognativ Inc. Prize at the 2024 Milken-Penn GSE Education Business Plan Competition.
“We are really fortunate that the University of Pennsylvania was founded by Ben Franklin, an inventor,” said Michael Golden, GRD’07, vice dean of innovative programs and partnerships, “so invention and innovation have been at the core of the work we’ve done since the start.”

Identifying challenges and meeting them with novel solutions requires bold, out-of-the-box thinking. So, too, does adapting to new technologies. But innovation without practical implementation is for the ivory tower, not an institution like Penn GSE, which has always been committed to addressing real-world problems with actionable solutions.

“The key thing about the way GSE thinks about innovation is we don’t do innovation for innovation’s sake,” said Dean Strunk. “We’re not just innovating to get the newest, coolest, highest-tech innovation. We’re actually doing things that are intended to improve the public good and the world around us.”

Those innovations include pioneering research that aims to address everything from environmental justice to the promises and perils of AI. They include making interdisciplinary collaboration the foundation of problem-solving scholarship. And they include teaching with and about the latest emerging technologies, so that GSE students know how to use them to support learning in classrooms, community centers, and even C-suites.

A person wearing a VR headset smiles while holding a controller; a screen in the background shows a virtual scene with a stone structure.
Students explore uses for virtual reality in Penn GSE’s new AV/VR Lab.
“We know a lot about learning science and how people learn, and it is experiential,” said Golden. “We are so excited to have a makerspace and an AV/VR lab in our new building to be able to give students the opportunity to experiment, be creative, and use technologies in new ways—to become capable and facile with those technologies and also to think how they can apply them immediately, especially in teaching and learning.”

Because all innovations must iterate, even vanguard programs need to continually evolve. To that end, Penn GSE’s online Learning Analytics master’s program, which was designed to help students develop measurement, analysis, and predictive modeling expertise, already included a considerable amount of generative AI in its curriculum. But with an increasing emphasis in that area, the program is now adding new courses and being renamed the online Learning Analytics and Artificial Intelligence master’s program.

Innovation is ever-changing, so this third priority in Together for Good is an ever-moving target. There will always be new technologies to address, new pedagogy to invent, and new research findings to put into practice. There is no endpoint to this work, and there is always more to learn. And that is just how the dean likes it.

“We need people to continue to push us, continue to check us, continue to think through with us how this vision can grow and evolve over the next 10 years, because we don’t even know today the education problems of tomorrow,” said Dean Strunk. “One of the commitments that we are making is that the strategic plan is a living document. We’re going to continue to think about the most pressing challenges that we need to address. And we will continue to address them, because that is our job.”

PRIORITY FOUR

Line drawing of a hand with two speech bubbles above it.

ELEVATE

ELEVATING EDUCATION’S ROLE WITHIN DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY
In these divisive times it has never been more apparent that a healthy, functioning democratic society relies on its citizens’ ability to openly express ideas, critically analyze arguments, and find shared humanity with those who are different. Penn GSE, said Dean Strunk, has an ethical duty to prepare its students with those skills.

“When I first got to Penn GSE I didn’t actually know this was a strength that we had,” she said. “And then I was talking to our faculty, and I learned about how many of them are doing this work every day, in their research and in their instruction.”

Person sitting in front of a blackboard with handwritten notes, smiling and holding a pen.
Associate Professor Abby Reisman in her classroom.
Associate Professor Abby Reisman, a national expert on social studies teacher preparation, helps teachers understand how to facilitate constructive conversations between students with different perspectives about the history and the social issues that make up the social studies curriculum. MRMJJ Presidential Professor Sigal Ben-Porath “literally wrote the book on free speech on campus,” according to Dean Strunk, and her work explores campus open expression policies and the ways that schools and universities can sustain and advance democracy. And Jonathan Zimmerman, the Judy and Howard Berkowitz Professor of Education, is a historian of education who studies the history of free speech in schools.

“No other school of education has this kind of concentration of talent that studies this area across multiple levels,” said Dean Strunk. “We are just incredibly lucky that we have this group at this time to meet the needs that we know are coming in our polarized society.”

Like many other things we are taught in school—state capitals, algebra, how to read—participating productively in difficult conversations is a skill no one is born with.

“You have to learn how to do it,” says Ben-Porath, who is also the faculty director of Penn’s Stavros Niarchos Foundation Paideia Program. “You have to prepare for that. And this is an expertise that GSE has and can provide to other parts of the University here—and [to] other universities and schools. . . . There is a need for that expertise outside of GSE, which I really think we can transfer beyond our walls.”

In 10 years, my hope is that we have changed the world. I know that that sounds grandiose and unlikely, but I don’t think it is.

—Dean Katharine Strunk

Reisman and Ben-Porath co-teach a course, “Classroom Discourse,” that draws from readings in philosophy, learning theory, and empirical research on discussion-focused classroom interventions and teacher professional development. Students explore the emotional, practical, legal, and social obstacles to classroom discourse and participate actively in exercises that help them develop skills to foster and facilitate discussion. Their class could be adapted as a model across universities and school districts.
A colorful painting depicting a diverse crowd gathering outside near trees, a yellow structure, and a red train in the background.
Voting-themed mural inside a third-grade classroom at the Lea School.
“The research about productive classroom conversations [shows] that you start off by recognizing that in order to have a conversation, you have to build trust, and the trust is going to be built by cultivating opportunities for exchanges across small differences,” said Ben-Porath. “This is why a college classroom and, somewhat differently, a K–12 classroom, are the best places to have hard conversations—because these are sustained communities where we have a shared reason to be there. We already have a shared foundation—whether it’s that you live in the same neighborhood, or it’s because you all are interested in chemistry—where there already is common ground.”

This work has critical implications beyond the classroom. Preparing children for democratic citizenship was a major reason for the creation of public schools in America. Those public schools now need to prepare the citizens of tomorrow to face some overwhelming challenges, such as climate change and inequality, in an era when it seems people can’t even agree on the facts of the matter. Educators who can facilitate inclusive discussions on complex topics with their students will help produce engaged citizens who are prepared for civil debate and civic participation.

“I think we’re at a moment where everyone understands the importance of discourse and the importance of conversation—nobody can deny it,” said Reisman. “And I think the challenge is that we’re still working with really impoverished models of what classroom discourse looks like. . . . As a school of education, we must support teachers in addressing this knotty problem of how to navigate discussions in this really complex historical moment.”